Considering this 3D object as an art which represents the complexity of life and the day to day changes we are experiencing in it. So actually what this 3D object does is: it changes its shape, color, form and appearance of it.
It is just a comparison of creating an organic artwork, which involves human emotions; done by just AI completely and the need for human intelligence to do justice to that particular artwork.
Considering the materials used in this objects (rubber band, color paper, thread, scribbled things) over that as things and emotions happening in our day to day life, and how it gets impacted in that object.
Even when every aspects and descriptions have been feeded to the AI program, the output of artwork, its ability to replicate our life, the constant measuring of our life possibilities make that artwork more mechanical, the organic life of that art work will be missed, and a need for biologically, emotionally accessible human intelligence demand arises.
The Cone helps categorise future scenarios into four distinct buckets:
And lastly, preferred futures, the Holy Grail of speculative design. Preferred is where you place the scenarios you want to happen.
This is where most design practitioners operate. It describes what is likely to happen unless there is an extreme disturbance or turmoil.
Plausible refers to what could happen. It’s where scenario planning and speculation live.
At the edge of the cone is what might happen, even if it’s difficult to imagine.
Discussion
No feedback has been added yet
Share a Thought